toddlers and teens

When teacher-education is done right, a bond is formed between the presenter and the group of adult learners. If both parties are open, engaged, attentive, and respectful, the dialogues are more meaningful, the practice sessions are more energized, and it’s common for everyone to experience a “flow experience”, a concept developed by psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, who studied how Montessori education can be structured to achieve it. I’ve found, in these decades of teacher-education, that the same is true for quality training course. “Where did the afternoon go?” This trusted relationship continues after the course is over, when these adult learners have questions once they are in their first months of teaching. If passion has been sparked and that flame nurtured, it remains. Last week, an email from Via, in Bandung, was in my inbox. What does it mean that the first stage of Montessori Development and the third stage are the same?

There are several similarities between children birth – 6 and 12 – 18.  First, consider that the child in the First Plane is orienting themselves to this new world and environment in which they find themselves. They are learning new skills, certainly, but also observe them cognizant of being an individual, identifying themselves as part of a family, defining their relationship with their caregivers, and discovering their role. They are, at birth, nascent human beings.  A teenager, on the cusp of puberty at the Third Plane of Development is also orienting themselves to a new world, the world and environment of adulthood. They are learning new skills, certainly, but they are now cognizant of becoming an adult, seeing their changing identification within their family, defining a new relationship with parents, thinking about who they are, what music they like, what books they enjoy, how they feel about larger societal issues.  They are, at 12 years old, nascent adults. 

How do we see these manifest in their behavior? There are similarities here as well, especially noticeable if you’ve had the opportunity to parent or teach children in both planes. Children in the first plane are highly egocentric; they are the center of their world. “What do I want right now?” “What do I need right now?”  The child in the third plane is similarly motivated. “Everyone will be staring at me” “No one understands me”.  Children in the first plane, especially in the second subplane, have a complex relationship with their caregivers. Observe the five-year old on the playground who runs to their father to get picked up only to immediately wiggle away to climb up the slide. Observe the 15 year old who wants to be independent. “Why can’t I go to the concert at the arena?  You never let me do anything, I’m suffocating in this house!” but the next minute wants to curl up on the couch with mom or dad and watch old cartoons.

What’s fascinating to consider is that Dr. Montessori made these assertions well before science and medicine had access to brain studies. And yet, we know now that the first and third planes are both times of tremendous brain and neural growth. It’s common knowledge that from birth to six is the greatest growth, but less so that the second period of greatest growth is from twelve to eighteen years of age. First and Third represent growth. Second and Fourth represent consolidation.

follow the child

The phrase “follow the child,” used in Montessori terms, is an axiom in the truest sense of the word: it is a truth that is self-evident. Upon these three words a pedagogy was built, and this system continues to expand well past the 100th anniversary of its inception. The fact that the world continues to catch up with a model which has been established and successful for more than a century serves as confirmation of its validity. As is the case with so many concepts we encounter in Montessori education, “follow the child” exists as a literal exhortation while at the same time revealing a deeper understanding of child development. Follow the child! As teachers (and good parents), we are exhorted to dictate less information and to allow more exploration. If the child shows an interest in the sensorial materials, the adult gives a lesson! When a child asks, “How do I add these if their denominators aren’t the same?,” the teacher presents the fraction circles. Follow the interest! Follow the question! Follow the child.

In a larger sense, “follow the child” is also a reflection of two overarching themes. First, the adult’s role is one of preparation and guidance and as a facilitator of the natural process that marks each child’s development. Second, a strong measure of independence is both a more humane approach to education and a proven component of a more profound level of learning.

Following is riskier than leading. For one thing, you have to watch where you step. For the teacher, this means adopting a level of comfort with trust, yes, but a trust that is buttressed by experience. For the child, being followed also involves trust: trusting that the adult, whether parent or teacher, is there to point things out along the way, provide support in case of a stumble, and allow him or her the space to walk.

montessori’s living legacy

As part of the celebration of Dr. Montessori’s birthday last week, I was asked to participate in a global, daylong series of webinars, sponsored by Montessori-Haus Asia that spanned five time zones: China, Australia, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, and my house in Berwick, Maine, United States.  As a nine hour event, it was meant to reach an international audience with the question, “One hundred fifty-five years after Maria Montessori’s birth, what is her legacy?” The word legacy seems, at least for me, to connote something that is finite. It was accomplished, in the past tense, and it’s been left to a school, a community, the world. That doesn’t really fit how I see Dr. Montessori’s work, and that formed the basis of my session. I see the Montessori method as alive and current. What she initiated as supposition, has become accepted conclusion.

I talked about the enormity of research, really over the last 50 years, be it educational or even neurological, that supports what Dr. Montessori somehow intuited over a century ago. They are too numerous to list here, but here are a few, just in the last 20 years, to highlight a small fraction. A study comparing Montessori and non-Montessori elementary students found Montessori children showed “superior outcomes in reading, math, executive function, and social problem-solving, suggesting the method supports both academic and social development.” (Lillard & Else-Quest (2006, Science) Research following Montessori middle school graduates into high school found they “performed as well or better than peers in math and science, indicating Montessori builds a strong foundation for later academic success”. (Dohrmann et al. 2007, Journal of Research in Childhood Education) An early difficulty interpreting Montessori studies was that it was conducted by Montessorians, which is of course, just bad science. There is much more rigor in these more recent studies. A randomized controlled trial of Montessori preschool programs showed “children had better academic outcomes, social understanding, and mastery orientation compared to peers in conventional classrooms.” (Lillard et al. (2017, Frontiers in Psychology) According to another study, using experience sampling (when subjects record their feelings and thoughts in real time), Montessori adolescents reported “higher levels of intrinsic motivation, interest, and engagement in learning than peers in traditional schools.” Rathunde & Csikszentmihalyi (2005, American Journal of Education)  A similar study found Montessori students demonstrated “greater social cognition and positive peer interactions, suggesting the prepared environment fosters not only academic but also social-emotional growth.” (Lopata, Wallace, & Finn (2005, Journal of Research in Childhood Education). And last Spring, I read a fascinating study, reported in MontessoriPublic, titled, “Learning by Heart or with Heart: Brain Asymmetry Reflects Pedagogical Practices”, published in Brain Sciences (August 2023). This study used “neuroimaging to compare brain hemisphere asymmetry in schoolchildren educated in traditional versus Montessori settings.” On admissions tours at the Cornerstone School, I often joke, sort of, that, “Montessori kids are just wired differently”. I was right! Traditional‐schooled children showed “greater rightward asymmetry—linked with fixed, situation-specific memorization, but Montessori students showed left-dominant asymmetry, associated with semantic encoding and flexible conceptual connections.”  As Montessori educators, we feel that our classrooms support not only  in-depth learning, but also a deeply integrated experience that weaves knowledge in all curriculum areas into an integrated whole. A tapestry of understanding. It’s gratifying to know the concepts which Dr. Montessori felt were true, are in fact demonstrably true.